Is a 1998 Honda Accord a good car?
Yes—provided it has been well maintained, a 1998 Honda Accord can still be a solid, budget-friendly daily driver, especially in four-cylinder and manual-transmission form. However, age-related wear, outdated safety features, and known automatic-transmission issues (more common on V6 models) mean condition and service history matter more than the badge.
Contents
What makes the 1998 Accord notable today
The 1998 Accord launched the sixth generation of Honda’s best-selling midsize sedan, known for its straightforward engineering, roomy cabin, and strong reliability track record. Nearly three decades on, it remains appealing for low purchase prices, easy parts availability, and simple DIY maintenance. But its age and safety limitations compared with modern cars require careful evaluation before buying.
Strengths
These are the key advantages shoppers and owners most often cite with the 1998 Accord.
- Durable four-cylinder engine (2.3L F23) with many examples exceeding 200,000 miles when serviced on schedule.
- Manual transmissions are generally robust and engaging; the car is simple and inexpensive to maintain.
- Parts are widely available and affordable; many repairs can be done by independent shops or DIYers.
- Comfortable ride and practical interior with good visibility for a car of its era.
- Real-world fuel economy that can still be reasonable for a 1990s midsize sedan (often mid-20s mpg for the 4-cylinder).
Taken together, these strengths make the 1998 Accord a compelling low-cost commuter if you prioritize mechanical simplicity and value over modern tech.
Weak points and risks
Despite its reputation, the 1998 Accord has specific issues and age-related risks that can affect ownership costs and reliability.
- Automatic transmission problems are more common on V6 models of this era; four-cylinder automatics fare better but still depend heavily on maintenance history.
- Timing belt service is critical on both the 4-cylinder and V6 (interference engines). If overdue, budget immediately for replacement (belt, water pump, tensioners, seals).
- Rust can be significant in snow-belt or coastal regions—often around rear wheel arches, rocker panels, and underbody components.
- Common age-related faults: worn motor mounts, suspension bushings, CV boots, window regulators, and EGR/idle issues (e.g., P0401).
- Safety is outdated: typically no stability control, limited airbags, and side-impact protection that lags modern standards.
- Potential recalls (e.g., ignition switch) and various airbag-related campaigns on some Hondas of the era—always verify via VIN.
These risks don’t disqualify the car, but they place extra emphasis on inspection quality and documented maintenance before purchase.
Ownership costs and practicality in 2025
Purchase prices are typically low—often in the $1,000–$4,000 range depending on condition, mileage, and region. Insurance is usually modest, and fuel costs remain manageable for the four-cylinder. However, significant deferred maintenance can quickly exceed the car’s market value. Emissions and low-emission-zone policies vary by region; some jurisdictions penalize pre-2000s petrol vehicles, so check local rules if you live in or near restricted zones.
What to check before you buy
Because condition varies widely on a 27-year-old car, a careful inspection is essential. The following checklist highlights high-impact items that can make or break the deal.
- Service records: Confirm timing belt service intervals, transmission fluid changes (especially on automatics), and cooling system upkeep.
- Transmission behavior: On a test drive, ensure smooth upshifts/downshifts, no slipping or delayed engagement; manuals should shift cleanly without synchro grind.
- Engine health: Look for steady idle, no misfires, minimal oil leaks, and a cold start without excessive valve noise or smoke.
- Rust and structure: Inspect rear quarters, rocker panels, floor pans, and subframe areas; severe structural rust is a walk-away.
- Suspension and steering: Check for clunks, uneven tire wear, and wandering; worn bushings and shocks are common but fixable.
- Brakes and tires: Ensure even braking and adequate tread; age-cracked tires are a hidden cost.
- Electricals and HVAC: Test windows, locks, lights, instrument cluster, radio, and A/C performance.
- Recalls and title: Run the VIN for open recalls and verify a clean title with consistent mileage history.
If most items check out and maintenance is documented, a 1998 Accord can be a low-drama purchase. Any red flags—especially transmission issues or structural rust—should justify walking away or negotiating sharply.
Who should consider it—and who shouldn’t
The 1998 Accord suits budget-minded drivers, students, and tinkerers seeking a practical, easy-to-service commuter. It’s less suitable for buyers prioritizing modern crash safety, advanced driver aids, or zero-hassle ownership without the possibility of age-related repairs.
Alternatives to consider
Shoppers with similar budgets might cross-shop comparable models that also offer strong reliability or newer safety tech.
- Toyota Camry (late 1990s–mid-2000s): Strong reliability reputation; similar timing belt considerations on V6 models.
- Honda Accord (2003–2007, especially 4-cyl/manual): Feels more modern; watch for V6 automatic issues on some years.
- Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic (early 2000s): Smaller but efficient; parts are plentiful and inexpensive.
- Ford Fusion or Hyundai Sonata (mid-2000s): Often newer for similar money; condition is key.
These alternatives can widen your options, especially if you want newer safety features or find a better-documented, rust-free example.
Verdict
A 1998 Honda Accord can still be a “good car” in 2025 if you buy the right one: preferably a rust-free, four-cylinder example with a manual transmission and thorough records, or an automatic that demonstrably shifts well with documented fluid changes. Treat it as a value play with realistic expectations about age-related maintenance and safety limitations.
Summary
Bottom line: The 1998 Accord remains a viable, low-cost commuter when maintained, with standout reliability in four-cylinder trims and manuals. Its weaknesses—aging safety tech, potential automatic-transmission troubles (notably on V6s), rust, and overdue timing belts—mean a careful inspection and VIN recall check are essential. If it passes those tests, it can deliver years of honest, affordable service.
Which year of accord is most reliable?
The 2013 Honda Accord is widely considered the most reliable year for the Honda Accord, based on both owner satisfaction and reliability ratings. Other years that are often cited for their reliability include 2006, 2007, 2011, 2015, and 2017. These models generally have fewer reported issues and are considered good choices for used car buyers.
Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
- 2006-2007: These models are often praised for their reliability and are considered solid choices for those seeking a used Accord.
- 2008-2012 (8th Generation): While some issues were reported with the 2008 and 2009 models (like excessive oil consumption), the later years in this generation, particularly 2011 and 2012, are generally well-regarded for their reliability and comfortable ride.
- 2013: This model year stands out as a top pick, consistently receiving high marks for reliability and owner satisfaction.
- 2015: Another strong contender for reliability, with some owners reporting no issues even after 100,000 miles.
- 2017: This year is also highlighted for its reliability and improved fuel efficiency.
- 2020-2022: These newer models have also earned positive reviews for their reliability and are considered solid options, particularly the 2020 and 2021 models.
How long does a 1998 Honda Accord last?
A well-maintained 1998 Honda Accord can easily last over 200,000 miles, and many have even reached 300,000 miles or more. The longevity of any vehicle, including a Honda Accord, depends heavily on the level of maintenance and care it receives throughout its life.
Here’s why a 1998 Honda Accord can last so long, and what factors contribute to its lifespan:
- Reliable Engine: . Opens in new tabHonda Accords are known for their durable engines, which are capable of lasting well over 200,000 miles with proper maintenance.
- Regular Maintenance: . Opens in new tabPerforming routine maintenance tasks like oil changes, tire rotations, and timely replacements of parts like the timing belt are crucial for extending the car’s lifespan.
- Driving Habits: . Opens in new tabModerate driving habits, avoiding aggressive acceleration and braking, and regular freeway driving can also contribute to a longer lifespan.
- Example of Longevity: . Opens in new tabA Reddit user on r/BuyItForLife shared a story of a 1998 Honda Accord that clocked over 266,000 miles, serving their family for over 20 years.
- Beyond 200,000 Miles: . Opens in new tabWhile 200,000 miles is often cited as a good lifespan for a Honda Accord, with proper care and maintenance, it’s not uncommon for these vehicles to exceed that milestone and reach 300,000 miles or more.
How much is a 1998 Honda Accord worth today?
A 1998 Honda Accord is generally worth between $400 and $2,500, depending on its specific condition, mileage, and features. For a more precise value, you should use online appraisal tools like Edmunds or Kelley Blue Book (KBB), as they consider factors like your location and the vehicle’s trim level.
Factors influencing value
- Condition: A car in excellent condition with no mechanical issues or major cosmetic flaws will command a higher price.
- Mileage: Lower mileage typically increases the vehicle’s value.
- Trim level: Higher trim levels, such as the EX or EX-L, often have more features and are worth more.
- Location: Prices can vary by region, so checking local listings on sites like Autotrader or Cars.com is helpful.
How to get a precise valuation
- 1. Use Appraisal Tools: Go to websites like Edmunds or Kelley Blue Book and enter your car’s specific details to get a free valuation.
- 2. Check Local Listings: Browse Autotrader and TrueCar to see what similar 1998 Honda Accords are currently listed for in your area.
What year was a bad year for the Honda Accord?
Honda Accord years to potentially avoid include the 1998-2002 models due to significant issues with the sixth-generation design, as well as 2003-2004 (V6 transmission problems), 2008-2010 (oil consumption, brake wear), 2013 (CVT hesitation, infotainment), and 2018 (engine problems, infotainment, recalls).
Specific Problematic Years and Their Issues
- 1998-2002: These models, part of the sixth generation, are known for a high number of problems, including transmission issues, steering malfunctions, and potential airbag faults.
- 2003-2004: The V6 models from these years experienced automatic transmission failures and problems with slipping or jerky shifting.
- 2008-2010: The four-cylinder models in these years faced issues like excessive oil consumption and premature brake wear.
- 2013: This year saw problems with Continuously Variable Transmissions (CVTs) and early complaints about the infotainment system.
- 2018: This model year suffered from numerous recalls and engine issues, as it was the first year for the turbo 4-cylinder engines.
More Recent Model Year Considerations
- 2018-2019: Early models in the tenth generation experienced HVAC and AC compressor problems and Bluetooth glitches, though these issues were often addressed in later production runs or software updates.
- 2018-2020: A fuel pump recall affected vehicles from these model years.
What to Look For
- Infotainment and Software: Issues like freezing screens or Bluetooth connectivity problems were reported in some earlier models and were often remedied in later model years or via updates.
- Engine Issues: Some models, like the 2018, had significant engine-related problems.
- Brake Wear: Excessive and premature brake wear was a noted problem in some 2008-2010 models.
- Transmission Concerns: Transmission issues, including slipping, jerky shifting, or complete failure, were a significant concern for models like the 2003-2004 V6s.
- CVT Hesitation: The 2013 model year was marked by CVT hesitation, a common problem with some vehicles equipped with CVTs.