Harley-Davidson Low Rider S vs. Low Rider ST: What’s the Difference?
The Low Rider S is a stripped, performance-focused Softail with minimal bodywork; the Low Rider ST adds a frame-mounted FXRT-style fairing and lockable saddlebags for sport-touring use, making it taller and heavier but better on highways. Both share the same Softail chassis and Milwaukee-Eight 117 engine, but they target different riding styles: the S for aggressive, bare-bones performance, and the ST for long-haul capability with wind protection and storage.
Contents
Despite their different personalities, the Low Rider S and Low Rider ST are built on the same modern Softail platform and, in recent model years, use Harley-Davidson’s Milwaukee-Eight 117 (1,923cc) V-Twin. Expect stout low-end torque (around 125 lb-ft in U.S. trim), a six-speed transmission, an inverted front fork, and dual front disc brakes on both. Mid-mount controls and a 5-gallon tank are common, and both can be outfitted with rider-aid packages (Cornering ABS, traction control, and related enhancements) depending on market and model year.
What Sets Them Apart
Bodywork, Wind Protection, and Storage
This is the clearest difference: the Low Rider S keeps it minimalist, while the Low Rider ST is a factory “performance bagger” with weather protection and luggage. If you ride at highway speeds or in varied weather, that distinction matters every mile.
- Low Rider S: Minimal bodywork with a small headlight cowl; no standard saddlebags.
- Low Rider ST: Frame-mounted FXRT-inspired fairing with a vented windshield to reduce buffeting; color-matched, lockable hard saddlebags with roughly 50+ liters of combined storage and quick-release convenience.
- ST fairing benefits: Less rider fatigue on long trips, better stability in crosswinds, and space for optional integrated audio.
In practice, the ST’s fairing and bags transform the Softail into a credible light tourer without jumping to a full-size touring platform, while the S stays lean and focused for urban and canyon riding.
Ergonomics and Ride Character
Ergonomics lean sportier on the S and more distance-ready on the ST. Both use mid controls, but the stance and wind management feel very different.
- Low Rider S: More aggressive “moto” vibe with taller risers and a wind-in-the-chest experience; it feels lighter and more flickable.
- Low Rider ST: Slightly taller rear suspension and the added fairing shift the feel toward planted highway stability and daylong comfort.
- Seat height: Both hover around 28 inches; the ST tends to sit marginally taller due to suspension and load expectations.
If you prioritize agility and a raw connection to the ride, the S delivers. If you want reduced fatigue over distance and better weather protection, the ST makes everyday roads feel shorter.
Weight and Dimensions
The ST’s added equipment makes it heavier and a touch taller, but wheelbase and core chassis geometry are essentially the same. That preserves the family handling DNA while changing the feel.
- Weight: The ST typically runs about 40–45 pounds heavier in running order than the S, owing to the fairing and saddlebags.
- Ground clearance and lean: Similar on recent model years, with the ST set up to maintain cornering clearance despite added luggage.
- Fuel capacity: Both carry roughly 5 gallons, so touring range is comparable; the ST’s fairing just makes that range more comfortable.
The added mass on the ST is noticeable at parking-lot speeds, but on the highway it pays back with superior stability and reduced rider fatigue.
Instrumentation and Technology
Both bikes have modern digital instrumentation and can be optioned with rider safety features; placement and options differ slightly, especially with the ST’s fairing.
- Low Rider S: A clean, handlebar-mounted gauge layout on recent models for quick glanceability.
- Low Rider ST: Instrumentation integrates with the fairing, with provisions for optional audio components.
- Tech options: Cornering Rider Safety Enhancements and cruise control are available on both; standard/optional status can vary by model year and market.
The fairing gives the ST a natural place for accessories (like audio) that the S would need to add via aftermarket or additional mounting solutions.
Price and Value
Because of its fairing, saddlebags, and additional hardware, the Low Rider ST typically costs several thousand dollars more than the Low Rider S when new.
- Low Rider S: Better value if you want maximum performance per dollar and plan to ride shorter distances or add only selective accessories.
- Low Rider ST: Better value if you want factory wind protection, luggage, and touring readiness without stepping up to a full-dress tourer.
- Resale: ST models often hold value well due to strong demand for factory “performance bagger” setups.
The gap in MSRP reflects the ST’s added capability out of the box; outfitting an S to match would typically erase much of the initial savings.
Which One Should You Choose?
Your riding mix should decide it: urban blasts and canyon carving favor the S; longer, faster, more variable-weather rides favor the ST.
- Pick the Low Rider S if you want a lighter, more aggressive feel; minimal bodywork; and plan to customize selectively.
- Pick the Low Rider ST if you want wind protection, built-in storage, and highway comfort straight from the factory.
- If you’re undecided: Test-ride both back-to-back on a highway stretch and a tight backroad—the difference becomes clear within minutes.
Either way, you’re getting the same muscular 117 engine and Softail handling; it’s about how you prefer to package that performance for real-world riding.
Key Differences at a Glance
Here is a quick reference to the main distinctions between the Low Rider S and Low Rider ST on recent model years.
- Engine/chassis: Shared Softail platform; Milwaukee-Eight 117 V-Twin.
- Bodywork: S is minimal; ST adds a frame-mounted FXRT-style fairing with a vented windshield.
- Luggage: S has none stock; ST includes lockable, removable hard saddlebags (roughly 50+ liters combined).
- Ergonomics: S feels sportier and more exposed; ST is more relaxed and protected at speed.
- Weight: ST is roughly 40–45 lb heavier in running order.
- Instrumentation: S uses a handlebar-mounted display; ST integrates gauges into the fairing (varies slightly by year).
- Use case: S for performance-first cruising; ST for sport-touring and long-distance versatility.
If you prioritize stripped-down performance and style, go S; if your riding regularly includes highway miles and gear, the ST’s fairing and bags are worth the extra weight and cost.
Summary
Both the Low Rider S and Low Rider ST deliver the same muscular Milwaukee-Eight 117 performance and modern Softail handling. The difference is in mission: the S is the lighter, more raw, performance cruiser; the ST is the factory-built sport-tourer with a frame-mounted fairing and hard bags. Choose based on how far, how fast, and how often you ride in the wind and weather—your preferred miles will make the right choice obvious.
How much HP does a Low Rider S have?
The Harley-Davidson Low Rider S’s horsepower varies by model year, but the current 2025 model features a high-output Milwaukee-Eight 117 V-twin engine producing approximately 114 horsepower. Other models, like the 2024, produced around 93 hp, while some older versions had different power figures.
Key Horsepower Figures:
- 2025 Low Rider S: Around 114 horsepower.
- 2024 Low Rider S: Approximately 93 horsepower.
Engine Details:
- The Low Rider S uses the powerful Milwaukee-Eight 117 V-twin engine.
- The 2025 model’s engine is a “High Output” version, which gives it a significant horsepower boost.
What This Means for the Rider:
- The 114 hp output of the 2025 model provides a considerable increase in power, especially in the mid-range and higher RPMs.
- This makes the Low Rider S a very performance-oriented cruiser, capable of “ripping” right from the factory.
What is Low Rider S?
Low Rider® S 117 model is an aggressive performance kingpin designed for the rider seeking unapologetic power, the rider willing to push their bike to the limit. The Milwaukee-Eight® 117 powertrain gives the Low Rider® S 117 motorcycle owner instant bragging rights. Premium suspension enhances the riding experience.
What is the difference between the Low Rider S and the lowrider ST?
The main difference is that the Harley-Davidson Low Rider S is a performance-focused cruiser with a minimal headlight cowl, while the Low Rider ST is a more comfortable, versatile sport-touring variant that adds a frame-mounted fairing and two hard saddlebags. Both bikes share the same Softail chassis and Milwaukee-Eight 117 engine, but the ST is heavier and better suited for longer rides, whereas the S is lighter and excels at faster city runs and aggressive riding.
Low Rider S (S for Sport)
- Focus: Performance, aggressive styling, and sporty city riding.
- Features: Stripped-down design with a minimal headlight cowl for a classic look.
- Pros: Lighter weight, more agile for quick city rides, and a less expensive option.
- Cons: Less comfortable on longer rides due to a lack of wind protection and storage space.
Low Rider ST (ST for Sport Touring)
- Focus: Comfort and utility for longer rides and light touring.
- Features:
- Frame-mounted fairing: Offers substantial wind protection and an FXRT-inspired look.
- Hard saddlebags: Provides lockable, integrated storage for gear.
- Slightly heavier: The added components increase its overall weight.
- Pros: Enhanced comfort on the highway, increased storage, and a more versatile touring capability.
- Cons: More expensive upfront and a heavier bike.
This video compares the Harley-Davidson Low Rider ST and S, highlighting their key differences: 1mRide Like a Pro Jerry PalladinoYouTube · Apr 4, 2024
In summary, your choice depends on your priorities:
- Choose the Low Rider S if you prioritize aggressive styling, lighter weight, and budget-friendly performance for shorter rides .
- Choose the Low Rider ST if you prioritize comfort, practicality, and storage for long-distance riding and want a more versatile bike .
How fast does a lowrider st go?
1. Detailed Specs: 2023 Harley Davidson Low Rider ST
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Torque | 169.48 Nm at 3,500 rpm |
| Top Speed | 120 mph |
| Fuel Mileage | 47 mpg |
| Lean Angle | Right: 31.3° Left: 31.3° |
