Home » FAQ » General » Why cant we put solar panels on cars?

Why Solar Panels Aren’t Common on Cars

We can put solar panels on cars, and a few models already do—but for most drivers, the energy they add is small, the cost and complexity are high, and rooftop solar on homes or carports is far more effective. The limits come down to physics (too little sun-catching area on a car), real-world usage (shade, weather, parking indoors), and engineering trade-offs (weight, aerodynamics, heat, and safety).

The Physics Sets a Hard Ceiling

Even with modern high-efficiency cells, a car simply doesn’t have enough sun-facing surface area to harvest the energy needed for daily driving. The roof, hood, and trunk together can only collect so much sunlight, and much of the time the car isn’t positioned like a solar farm.

  • Limited area: A typical sedan or crossover offers roughly 3–5 square meters of usable, well-oriented surface. That’s small compared with a rooftop array.
  • Sun angle and orientation: Cars rarely point panels directly at the sun; they park at random angles, often under trees or buildings, and may be indoors during daylight.
  • Weather variability: Clouds, haze, dust, snow, and seasonal sun angles cut output significantly, especially outside of sunny regions.
  • Panel efficiency and heat: Commercial cells are around 20–23% efficient; performance drops roughly 0.3–0.5% per °C above 25°C. Car roofs can hit 60–70°C, trimming output notably on the hottest days.
  • Shading sensitivity: Partial shading from roof racks, antennas, or nearby objects can disproportionately reduce power, unless costly mitigation (e.g., more bypass diodes/optimizers) is added.

Together, these factors mean there’s a strict upper bound on how much energy a car can collect, and most real-world days fall well below that theoretical maximum.

The Numbers, Quickly

Back-of-the-envelope math shows why onboard solar is a niche range extender rather than a primary fuel source for most cars.

  • Peak sunlight at Earth’s surface is about 1,000 W/m² at noon in ideal conditions; with ~20% efficient panels, that’s ~200 W per square meter.
  • A car with ~4 m² of well-placed panels might see a peak of ~800 W in perfect sun.
  • Across a full, clear day, that could yield on the order of 3–5 kWh in sunny climates; many locations, seasons, and parking situations will deliver 1–3 kWh or less.
  • Typical EV efficiency is roughly 0.15–0.20 kWh per mile (3–5 miles per kWh). So 3 kWh might add about 15–20 miles in a best-case sunny day; average real-world gains are commonly in the single-digit to low-teens miles per day.

Those miles can be useful, but they don’t replace overnight charging or fast charging for most drivers, and the variability makes planning around them difficult.

Engineering and Economic Trade-offs

Integrating solar into a vehicle involves compromises that automakers and buyers must weigh against modest energy gains.

  • Cost and weight: Automotive-grade, curved, impact-resistant modules and power electronics add cost and mass that slightly reduces efficiency and range.
  • Aerodynamics and packaging: Panel integration can constrain styling and airflow; any surface irregularities may increase drag and wind noise.
  • Durability and warranty: Panels must survive hail, vibration, car washes, and 10–15 years of UV and thermal cycling, complicating warranties and repairs.
  • Electrical integration: Managing variable, low-power inputs into high-voltage traction packs requires DC/DC conversion, controls, and safety isolation.
  • Safety and regulations: Glare, crashworthiness, pedestrian safety, and repairability standards all apply to solar-integrated bodywork.

These hurdles don’t make onboard solar impossible; they make it a premium or niche feature rather than a mass-market solution.

When Onboard Solar Can Make Sense

There are scenarios where adding solar to a vehicle is practical or strategically valuable, even if it doesn’t power most driving.

  • Trickle-charging accessories: Keeping 12V systems or small auxiliary batteries topped up in fleets or vehicles that sit parked outdoors.
  • Ultra-efficient vehicles: Very light, low-drag EVs with frugal energy use can turn a few kilowatt-hours into meaningful daily range.
  • Commercial rooftops: Vans, buses, and trailers have large flat roofs; solar can offset refrigeration or hotel loads, reducing idling and fuel use.
  • Long-duration parking: Airports or workplace lots in sunny regions can capture useful energy if the car is parked outside for many hours.
  • Off-grid or disaster resilience: Limited self-charging provides redundancy when grid power is unavailable.

In these use cases, the value isn’t “free fuel for all driving,” but incremental energy, convenience, or resilience.

What Automakers and Startups Have Tried

Several production cars and prototypes have tested the waters with factory solar roofs or full-body solar integration, with mixed outcomes.

  • Hybrids with solar roofs: Models like the Hyundai Sonata Hybrid and certain Toyota Prius variants offered solar roofs primarily to support auxiliary loads or add a few miles per sunny day.
  • EVs with optional solar: The Fisker Ocean’s “SolarSky” roof was marketed as adding up to hundreds of miles per year in ideal conditions; real-world gains depend heavily on climate and parking.
  • Solar-centric startups: Lightyear (the 0) delivered a limited run before bankruptcy in 2023; Sono Motors canceled its Sion solar car program in 2023. Aptera, a three-wheeled ultra-efficient EV, continues development with ambitious solar-range claims, but as of 2024 it remained pre-production.
  • Concepts and demos: Projects like Mercedes-Benz’s Vision EQXX explored ultra-efficiency with integrated solar for auxiliary power rather than primary propulsion.
  • Commercial transport: Truck trailers and buses increasingly use rooftop PV to power refrigeration or cabin systems, where roof area is ample and loads are steady.

The pattern is consistent: onboard solar is workable as a supplement or marketing differentiator, but rarely transformative for mainstream cars.

The Better Play: Put Solar on Buildings, Not Cars

Stationary solar—on homes, garages, carports, and warehouses—beats onboard solar handily. Panels can be optimally oriented, kept cool and clean, scaled to tens of square meters, and connected to the grid for 24/7 utility. Pairing stationary solar with smart charging at home or work delivers far more clean miles per dollar and far steadier energy supply.

Outlook

Cell efficiencies continue to improve, with tandem and perovskite-silicon technologies pushing past 25% in labs, and flexible modules are getting tougher. Those gains will help, but the limiting factor—surface area—doesn’t change. Expect solar on cars to grow as a niche option for auxiliary power or modest range adders, and to flourish on larger rooftops like vans, buses, and trailers, while the bulk of clean vehicle energy comes from stationary solar plus the grid.

Summary

We don’t commonly put solar panels on cars because there isn’t enough well-oriented surface area to harvest the energy most drivers need, and the real-world output is too variable. While onboard solar can add a handful of miles on sunny days and makes sense for specific use cases or larger commercial rooftops, the most effective strategy is to install solar on buildings and charge vehicles from that abundant, reliably generated electricity.

T P Auto Repair

Serving San Diego since 1984, T P Auto Repair is an ASE-certified NAPA AutoCare Center and Star Smog Check Station. Known for honest service and quality repairs, we help drivers with everything from routine maintenance to advanced diagnostics.

Leave a Comment